smart antenna systems

ABSTRACT

As the growing demand for mobile communications is constantly increasing, the need for better coverage, improved capacity and higher transmission quality rises. Thus, a more efficient use of the radio spectrum is required. smart antenna systems are capable of efficiently utilizing the radio spectrum and thus for an effective solution to the present wireless systems problems while achieving
reliable and high speed, high-data-rate transmission. In, fact smart antenna systems comprise several critical areas such as individual antenna array design, signal processing algorithms, space time processing, and network performance.

INTRODUCTION

Antennas Radio antennas couple electromagnetic energy from one medium (space) to another (e.g., wire, coaxial cable, or waveguide). Physical designs can vary greatly.
Omnidirectional Antennas Since the early days of wireless communications, there has been the simple dipole antenna, which radiates and receives equally well in all directions. To find its users, this single-element design broadcasts omnidirectionally in a pattern resembling ripples radiating outward in a pool of water. While adequate for simple RF environments where no specific knowledge of the users' whereabouts is available, this unfocused approach scatters signals, reaching desired users with only a small percentage of the overall energy sent out into the environment.

Figure 1. Omnidirectional Antenna and Coverage Patterns


Given this limitation, omnidirectional strategies attempt to overcome environmental challenges by simply boosting the power level of the signals broadcast. In a setting of numerous users (and interferers), this makes a bad situation worse in that the signals that miss the intended user become interference for those in the same or adjoining cells. In uplink applications (user to base station), omnidirectional antennas offer no preferential gain for the signals of served users. In other words, users have to shout over competing signal energy. Also, this single-element approach cannot selectively reject signals interfering with those of served users and has no spatial multipath mitigation or equalization capabilities. Omnidirectional strategies directly and adversely impact spectral efficiency, limiting frequency reuse. These limitations force system designers and network planners to devise increasingly sophisticated and costly remedies. In recent years, the limitations of broadcast antenna technology on the quality, capacity, and coverage of wireless systems have prompted an evolution in the fundamental design and role of the antenna in a wireless system.
Directional Antennas A single antenna can also be constructed to have certain fixed preferential transmission and reception directions. As an alternative to the brute force method of adding new transmitter sites, many conventional antenna towers today split, or sectorize cells. A 360° area is often split into three 120° subdivisions, each of which is covered by a slightly less broadcast method of transmission. All else being equal, sector antennas provide increased gain over a restricted range of azimuths as compared to an omnidirectional antenna. This is commonly referred to as antenna element gain and should not be confused with the processing gains associated with smart antenna systems. While sectorized antennas multiply the use of channels, they do not overcome the major disadvantages of standard omnidirectional antenna broadcast such as cochannel interference.


Figure 2. Directional Antenna and Coverage Pattern

Antenna Systems
How can an antenna be made more intelligent? First, its physical design can be modified by adding more elements. Second, the antenna can become an antenna system that can be designed to shift signals before transmission at each of the successive elements so that the antenna has a composite effect. This basic hardware and software concept is known as the phased array antenna.
The following summarizes antenna developments in order of increasing benefits and intelligence.
Sectorized Systems : Sectorized antenna systems take a traditional cellular area and subdivide it into sectors that are covered using directional antennas looking out from the same base station location. Operationally, each sector is treated as a different cell, the range of which is greater than in the omnidirectional case. Sector antennas increase the possible reuse of a frequency channel in such cellular systems by reducing potential interference across the original cell, and they are widely used for this purpose. As many as six sectors per cell have been used in practical service. When combining more than one of these directional antennas, the base station can cover all directions.
Figure 3. Sectorized Antenna and Coverage Patterns


Diversity Systems
In the next step toward smart antennas, the diversity system incorporates two antenna elements at the base station, the slight physical separation (space diversity) of which has been used historically to improve reception by counteracting the negative effects of multipath .
Diversity offers an improvement in the effective strength of the received signal by using one of the following two methods:
• switched diversity—Assuming that at least one antenna will be in a favorable location at a given moment, this system continually switches between antennas (connects each of the receiving channels to the best serving antenna) so as always to use the element with the largest output. While reducing the negative effects of signal fading, they do not increase gain since only one antenna is used at a time.

• Diversity combining—This approach corrects the phase error in two multipath signals and effectively combines the power of both signals to produce gain. Other diversity systems, such as maximal ratio combining systems, combine the outputs of all the antennas to maximize the ratio of combined received signal energy to noise.

Because macrocell-type base stations historically put out far more power on the downlink (base station to user) than mobile terminals can generate on the reverse path, most diversity antenna systems have evolved only to perform in uplink (user to base station).

Figure 4. Switched Diversity Coverage with Fading and Switched Diversity

Figure 5. Combined Diversity Effective Coverage Pattern with Single Element and Combined Diversity
Diversity antennas merely switch operation from one working element to another. Although this approach mitigates severe multipath fading, its use of one element at a time offers no uplink gain improvement over any other single-element approach. In high-interference environments, the simple strategy of locking onto the strongest signal or extracting maximum signal power from the antennas is clearly inappropriate and can result in crystal-clear reception of an interferer rather than the desired signal.
The need to transmit to numerous users more efficiently without compounding the interference problem led to the next step of the evolution antenna systems that intelligently integrate the simultaneous operation of diversity antenna elements.


Signal Propagation: Multipath And Cochannel Interference
Envision a perfectly still pool of water into which a stone is dropped. The waves that radiate outward from that point are uniform and diminish in strength evenly. This pure omnidirectional broadcasting equates to one caller's signal—originating at the terminal and going uplink. It is interpreted as one signal everywhere it travels.
Picture now a base station at some distance from the wave origin. If the pattern remains undisturbed, it is not a challenge for a base station to interpret the waves. But as the signal's waves begin to bounce off the edges of the pool, they come back (perhaps in a combination of directions) to intersect with the original wave pattern. As they combine, they weaken each other's strength. These are multipath interference problems.
Now, picture a few more stones being dropped in different areas of the pool, equivalent to other calls starting. How could a base station at any particular point in the pool distinguish which stone's signals were being picked up and from which direction? This multiple-source problem is called cochannel interference.
These are two-dimensional analogies; to fully comprehend the distinction between callers and/or signal in the earth's atmosphere, a base station must possess the intelligence to place the information it analyzes in a true spatial context.


Multipath
Multipath is a condition where the transmitted radio signal is reflected by physical features/structures, creating multiple signal paths between the base station and the user terminal.

Figure 8. The Effect of Multipath on a Mobile User
Problems Associated with Multipath
One problem resulting from having unwanted reflected signals is that the phases of the waves arriving at the receiving station often do not match. The phase of a radio wave is simply an arc of a radio wave, measured in degrees, at a specific point in time. Figure 9 illustrates two out-of-phase signals as seen by the receiver.


Figure: Two Out-of-Phase Multipath Signals

Conditions caused by multipath that are of primary concern are as follows:
• fading—When the waves of multipath signals are out of phase, reduction in signal strength can occur. One such type of reduction is called a fade; the phenomenon is known as "Rayleigh fading" or "fast fading."
A fade is a constantly changing, three-dimensional phenomenon. Fade zones tend to be small, multiple areas of space within a multipath environment that cause periodic attenuation of a received signal for users passing through them. In other words, the received signal strength will fluctuate downward, causing a momentary, but periodic, degradation in quality.


Figure 10. A Representation of the Rayleigh Fade Effect on a User Signal


• phase cancellation—When waves of two multipath signals are rotated to exactly 180° out of phase, the signals will cancel each other. While this sounds severe, it is rarely sustained on any given call (and most air interface standards are quite resilient to phase cancellation). In other words, a call can be maintained for a certain period of time while there is no signal, although with very poor quality. The effect is of more concern when the control channel signal is canceled out, resulting in a black hole, a service area in which call set-ups will occasionally fail.

• delay spread—The effect of multipath on signal quality for a digital air interface (e.g., TDMA) can be slightly different. Here, the main concern is that multiple reflections of the same signal may arrive at the receiver at different times. This can result in intersymbol interference (or bits crashing into one another) that the receiver cannot sort out. When this occurs, the bit error rate rises and eventually causes noticeable degradation in signal quality.



Figure 12. Multipath: The Cause of Delay Spread

While switched diversity and combining systems do improve the effective strength of the signal received, their use in the conventional macrocell propagation environment has been typically reverse-path limited due to a power imbalance between base station and mobile unit. This is because macrocell-type base stations have historically put out far more power than mobile terminals were able to generate on the reverse path.
• cochannel interference—One of the primary forms of man-made signal degradation associated with digital radio, cochannel interference occurs when the same carrier frequency reaches the same receiver from two separate transmitters.




Figure 13. Illustration of Cochannel Interference in a Typical Cellular Grid

As we have seen, both broadcast antennas as well as more focused antenna systems scatter signals across relatively wide areas. The signals that miss an intended user can become interference for users on the same frequency in the same or adjoining cells.
While sectorized antennas multiply the use of channels, they do not overcome the major disadvantage of standard antenna broadcast—cochannel interference. Management of cochannel interference is the number-one limiting factor in maximizing the capacity of a wireless system. To combat the effects of cochannel interference, smart antenna systems not only focus directionally on intended users, but in many cases direct nulls or intentional noninterference toward known, undesired users .inorder to avoid this we go for smart anntena systems
Smart
The concept of using multiple antennas and innovative signal processing to serve cells more intelligently has existed for many years. In fact, varying degrees of relatively costly smart antenna systems have already been applied in defense systems. Until recent years, cost barriers have prevented their use in commercial systems. The advent of powerful low-cost digital signal processors (DSPs), general-purpose processors (and ASICs), as well as innovative software-based signal-processing techniques (algorithms) have made intelligent antennas practical for cellular communications systems.

Today, when spectrally efficient solutions are increasingly a business imperative, these systems are providing greater coverage area for each cell site, higher rejection of interference, and substantial capacity improvements.
SMART ANTENNA SYSTEM
DEFINATION:
In truth, antennas are not smart—antenna systems are smart. Generally co-located with a base station, a smart antenna system combines an antenna array with a digital signal-processing capability to transmit and receive in an adaptive, spatially sensitive manner. In other words, such a system can automatically change the directionality of its radiation patterns in response to its signal environment. This can dramatically increase the performance characteristics (such as capacity) of a wireless system.
What Makes Them So Smart?
A simple antenna works for a simple RF environment. Smart antenna solutions are required as the number of users, interference, and propagation complexity grow. Their smarts reside in their digital signal-processing facilities.
Like most modern advances in electronics today, the digital format for manipulating the RF data offers numerous advantages in terms of accuracy and flexibility of operation. Speech starts and ends as analog information. Along the way, however, smart antenna systems capture, convert, and modulate analog signals for transmission as digital signals and reconvert them to analog information on the other end.
Working of Smart Antenna Systems
Traditional switched beam and adaptive array systems enable a base station to customize the beams they generate for each remote user effectively by means of internal feedback control. Generally speaking, each approach forms a main lobe toward individual users and attempts to reject interference or noise from outside of the main lobe.

Listening to the Cell (Uplink Processing)
It is assumed here that a smart antenna is only employed at the base station and not at the handset or subscriber unit. Such remote radio terminals transmit using omnidirectional antennas, leaving it to the base station to selectively separate the desired signals from interference selectively.
Typically, the received signal from the spatially distributed antenna elements is multiplied by a weight, a complex adjustment of an amplitude and a phase. These signals are combined to yield the array output. An adaptive algorithm controls the weights according to predefined objectives. For a switched beam system, this may be primarily maximum gain; for an adaptive array system, other factors may receive equal consideration. These dynamic calculations enable the system to change its radiation pattern for optimized signal reception.
Speaking to the Users (Downlink Processing)
The task of transmitting in a spatially selective manner is the major basis for differentiating between switched beam and adaptive array systems. As described below, switched beam systems communicate with users by changing between preset directional patterns, largely on the basis of signal strength. In comparison, adaptive arrays attempt to understand the RF environment more comprehensively and transmit more selectively.
The type of downlink processing used depends on whether the communication system uses time division duplex (TDD), which transmits and receives on the same frequency (e.g., PHS and DECT) or frequency division duplex (FDD), which uses separate frequencies for transmit and receiving (e.g., GSM). In most FDD systems, the uplink and downlink fading and other propagation characteristics may be considered independent, whereas in TDD systems the uplink and downlink channels can be considered reciprocal. Hence, in TDD systems uplink channel information may be used to achieve spatially selective transmission. In FDD systems, the uplink channel information cannot be used directly and other types of downlink processing must be considered.

TYPES OF SMART ANTENNA SYSTEMS:
Terms commonly heard today that embrace various aspects of a smart antenna system technology include intelligent antennas, phased array, SDMA, spatial processing, digital beamforming, adaptive antenna systems, and others. Smart antenna systems are customarily categorized, however, as either switched beam or adaptive array systems.
The following are distinctions between the two major categories of smart antennas regarding the choices in transmit strategy:
• switched beam—a finite number of fixed, predefined patterns or combining strategies (sectors)
• adaptive array—an infinite number of patterns (scenario-based) that are adjusted in real time

Switched Beam Systems
Switched beam antenna systems form multiple fixed beams with heightened sensitivity in particular directions. These antenna systems detect signal strength, choose from one of several predetermined, fixed beams, and switch from one beam to another as the mobile moves throughout the sector. Instead of shaping the directional antenna pattern with the metallic properties and physical design of a single element (like a sectorized antenna), switched beam systems combine the outputs of multiple antennas in such a way as to form finely sectorized (directional) beams with more spatial selectivity than can be achieved with conventional, single-element approaches.

Figure 6. Switched Beam System Coverage Patterns (Sectors)

In terms of radiation patterns, switched beam is an extension of the current microcellular or cellular sectorization method of splitting a typical cell. The switched beam approach further subdivides macrosectors into several microsectors as a means of improving range and capacity. Each microsector contains a predetermined fixed beam pattern with the greatest sensitivity located in the center of the beam and less sensitivity elsewhere. The design of such systems involves high-gain, narrow azimuthal beamwidth antenna elements.
The switched beam system selects one of several predetermined fixed-beam patterns (based on weighted combinations of antenna outputs) with the greatest output power in the remote user's channel. These choices are driven by RF or baseband DSP hardware and software. The system switches its beam in different directions throughout space by changing the phase differences of the signals used to feed the antenna elements or received from them. When the mobile user enters a particular macrosector, the switched beam system selects the microsector containing the strongest signal. Throughout the call, the system monitors signal strength and switches to other fixed microsectors as required.


Figure 14. Beamforming Lobes and Nulls that Switched Beam (Red) and Adaptive Array (Blue) Systems Might Choose for Identical User Signals (Green Line) and Cochannel Interferers (Yellow Lines)


Smart antenna systems communicate directionally by forming specific antenna beam patterns. When a smart antenna directs its main lobe with enhanced gain in the direction of the user, it naturally forms side lobes and nulls or areas of medium and minimal gain respectively in directions away from the main lobe. Different switched beam and adaptive smart antenna systems control the lobes and the nulls with varying degrees of accuracy and flexibility.
Adaptive Antennas Systems
Adaptive antenna technology represents the most advanced smart antenna approach to date. Using a variety of new signal-processing algorithms, the adaptive system takes advantage of its ability to effectively locate and track various types of signals to dynamically minimize interference and maximize intended signal reception.
Both systems attempt to increase gain according to the location of the user; however, only the adaptive system provides optimal gain while simultaneously identifying, tracking, and minimizing interfering signals.

Figure 7. Adaptive Array Coverage: A Representative Depiction of a Main Lobe Extending Toward a User with a Null Directed Toward a Cochannel Interference
The adaptive antenna systems approach communication between a user and base station in a different way, in effect adding a dimension of space. By adjusting to an RF environment as it changes (or the spatial origin of signals), adaptive antenna technology can dynamically alter the signal patterns to near infinity to optimize the performance of the wireless system.
Adaptive arrays utilize sophisticated signal-processing algorithms to continuously distinguish between desired signals, multipath, and interfering signals as well as calculate their directions of arrival. This approach continuously updates its transmit strategy based on changes in both the desired and interfering signal locations. The ability to track users smoothly with main lobes and interferers with nulls ensures that the link budget is constantly maximized because there are neither microsectors nor predefined patterns.
Figure 15 illustrates the relative coverage area for conventional sectorized, switched beam, and adaptive antenna systems. Both types of smart antenna systems provide significant gains over conventional sectored systems. The low level of interference on the left represents a new wireless system with lower penetration levels. The significant level of interference on the right represents either a wireless system with more users or one using more aggressive frequency reuse patterns. In this scenario, the interference rejection capability of the adaptive system provides significantly more coverage than either the conventional or switched beam system.




Figure 15. Coverage Patterns for Switched Beam and Adaptive Array Antennas

Relative Benefits/Tradeoffs of Switched Beam and Adaptive Array Systems
• integration—Switched beam systems are traditionally designed to retrofit widely deployed cellular systems. It has been commonly implemented as an add-on or appliqué technology that intelligently addresses the needs of mature networks. In comparison, adaptive array systems have been deployed with a more fully integrated approach that offers less hardware redundancy than switched beam systems but requires new build-out.
• range/coverage—Switched beam systems can increase base station range from 20 to 200 percent over conventional sectored cells, depending on environmental circumstances and the hardware/software used. The added coverage can save an operator substantial infrastructure costs and means lower prices for consumers. Also, the dynamic switching from beam to beam conserves capacity because the system does not send all signals in all directions. In comparison, adaptive array systems can cover a broader, more uniform area with the same power levels as a switched beam system.

• interference suppression—Switched beam antennas suppress interference arriving from directions away from the active beam's center. Because beam patterns are fixed, however, actual interference rejection is often the gain of the selected communication beam pattern in the interferer's direction. Also, they are normally used only for reception because of the system's ambiguous perception of the location of the received signal (the consequences of transmitting in the wrong beam being obvious). Also, because their beams are predetermined, sensitivity can occasionally vary as the user moves through the sector.
Switched beam solutions work best in minimal to moderate cochannel interference and have difficulty in distinguishing between a desired signal and an interferer. If the interfering signal is at approximately the center of the selected beam and the user is away from the center of the selected beam, the interfering signal can be enhanced far more than the desired signal. In these cases, the quality is degraded for the user.
Adaptive array technology currently offers more comprehensive interference rejection. Also, because it transmits an infinite, rather than finite, number of combinations, its narrower focus creates less interference to neighboring users than a switched-beam approach.

• spatial division multiple access (SDMA)—Among the most sophisticated utilizations of smart antenna technology is SDMA, which employs advanced processing techniques to, in effect, locate and track fixed or mobile terminals, adaptively steering transmission signals toward users and away from interferers. This adaptive array technology achieves superior levels of interference suppression, making possible more efficient reuse of frequencies than the standard fixed hexagonal reuse patterns. In essence, the scheme can adapt the frequency allocations to where the most users are located.


Figure 16. Fully Adaptive Spatial Processing, Supporting Two Users on the Same Conventional Channel Simultaneously in the Same Cell


Utilizing highly sophisticated algorithms and rapid processing hardware, spatial processing takes the reuse advantages that result from interference suppression to a new level. In essence, spatial processing dynamically creates a different sector for each user and conducts a frequency/channel allocation in an ongoing manner in real time.
Adaptive spatial processing integrates a higher level of measurement and analysis of the scattering aspects of the RF environment. Whereas traditional beam-forming and beam-steering techniques assume one correct direction of transmission toward a user, spatial processing maximizes the use of multiple antennas to combine signals in space in a method that transcends a one user-one beam methodology.


The Goals of a Smart Antenna System

The dual purpose of a smart antenna system is to augment the signal quality of the radio-based system through more focused transmission of radio signals while enhancing capacity through increased frequency reuse. More specifically, the features of and benefits derived from a smart antenna system include those listed in Table 1.


Feature Benefit
Signal gain—Inputs from multiple antennas are combined to optimize available power required to establish given level of coverage. better range/coverage—Focusing the energy sent out into the cell increases base station range and coverage. Lower power requirements also enable a greater battery life and smaller/lighter handset size.
Interference rejection—Antenna pattern can be generated toward cochannel interference sources, improving the signal-to-interference ratio of the received signals. increased capacity—Precise control of signal nulls quality and mitigation of interference combine to frequency reuse reduce distance (or cluster size), improving capacity. Certain adaptive technologies (such as space division multiple access) support the reuse of frequencies within the same cell.
Spatial diversity—Composite information from the array is used to minimize fading and other undesirable effects of multipath propagation. multipath rejection—can reduce the effective delay spread of the channel, allowing higher bit rates to be supported without the use of an equalizer
Power efficiency—combines the inputs to multiple elements to optimize available processing gain in the downlink (toward the user) reduced expense—Lower amplifier costs, power consumption, and higher reliability will result.
Applicable Standards
Smart antenna systems are applicable, with some modifications, to all major wireless protocols and standards, including those in Table 2.
Access methods analog—frequency division multiple access (FDMA) (e.g., AMPS, TACS, NMT)

digital—time division multiple access (TDMA) (e.g., GSM, IS–136); code division multiple access (CDMA) (e.g., IS–95)
Duplex methods frequency division duplex(FDD); time division duplex (TDD)

ADVANTAGES OF SMART ANTENNA SYSTEMS
1. The effect of multiple path fading in wireless communications environments can be significantly reduced.
2. Hand sets of a smart antenna systems have longer battery life because the power required to transmit to the base station is lower than that of conventional systems.
3. Smart antenna system can significantly improve signal-to-interference ratio of a wireless communications systems, and thus significantly increase the capacity of the system.
DISADVANTAGES
1. smart antenna systems are increased base station complexity, increased need for computational power.
2. cost is high.


APPLICATIONS
1. smart antenna systems are used in MIMO systems due to there tremendous spectral efficiency
3. smart antenna systems are used in CDMA techniques

CONCLUSION
This paper gives the brief idea about the smart antenna systems and their types which we are using to avoid the multipath and co-channel interference.These antennas having advance features like higher efficiency, higher reliability than the normal antennas.By using these antennas there is a reduction in the equipment size so these are expected to use in the future wireless systems.
REFERENCES
1.Sheikh.k.; Gesbert D; Gore.D; Paulraj.A “Smart antennas for broadband wirelessacess networks” “IEEEcommunications Magazine” volume 37,issue 11,nov 1999. Page 100-105.
2. www.iec.org.
3. www.google.co.in








SMART ANTENNA
SYSTEMS













OVERVIEW
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 ANTENNA SYSTEMS
 PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH MULTIPATH
 SMART ANTENNA SYSTEMS
• DEFINATION
• WORKING
• TYPES
 GOALS OF SMART ANTENNA SYSTEMS
 ADVANTAGES
 DISADVANTAGES
 APPLICATIONS
 CONCLUSION
 REFERENCES






Conclusion:
This paper introduced a sheduling approach for bluetooth scatternets that supports arbitary scatternet topologies as it requires no scatternet wide coordination .Because of thelow coordination overhead,it is able to rapidly adapt to changing traffic conditions.This is able to redistribute unused bandwidth following the idea of max-min fairness.I order to increase performance, minimum average service times were introduced.